Facepalm
There's been a less than effusive welcome for Mark Zuckerberg's call for governments and regulators to play a more active role in policing the Internet. The Electronic Frontier Foundation said his call for a "standardized approach" to "harmful content" would inevitably run into problems with trying to define such content. It added that Zuckerberg "does not speak for the Internet" and, if governments and regulators want to explore new rules for it, he is the last person to ask for advice. Zuckerberg's Washington Post article came shortly before Australia approved a social media law which will penalise online platforms that fail to take down violent material. The law, which lacks precision in many areas, provides for jail terms of up to 3 years for anyone working for a company that fails to remove material "expeditiously".