The information war
Russia appears increasingly desperate in its attempts to combat Ukraine's success in the information war. As well as its alarming claims about chemical and biological weapons, the Russian embassy in London claimed a pregnant woman fleeing a maternity hospital in Mariupol was in fact an actor placed there by Ukrainian propagandists. Perhaps not coincidentally, the use of the "crisis actor" defence mimics the tactics of conspiracy theorists in the US - and echoes broader claims on behalf of Russia that Ukraine isn fact bombing itself.
Despite being obviously ludicrous to audiences outside Russia, inside the country such an approach does appear to be effective - at least to some extent. People inside Ukraine report that their relatives in Russia simply don't believe the increasing devastation in Ukraine is caused by Moscow's forces. A Russian YouTuber went out on the streets of Moscow to question young people about their opinion of President Putin. "Is Putin great?" he asked. The "unedited" answers were...careful. Or as one interviewee said, "That's a dangerous question".
Younger Russians are more likely to obtain their news from sources other than state TV - and so it's hardly surprising that the government blocked Facebook and Twitter, and made independent coverage of the war effectively illegal. But, as even China has discovered, cutting off such information sources is easier said than done. Within hours of the social media block being announced, demand for virtual private networks (VPNs) reached a record high, according to Safety Detectives. Twitter launched a Tor onion service, which is designed to defeat censorship, and other media organisations including the New York Times and the BBC have done likewise. And, extraordinarily, Reuters reports that Facebook and Instagram will allow calls for violence against Russians and the Russian military.